Average sale price of a Metro Vancouver home rises 4.8% in past year

Friday, June 28th, 2013

Balanced housing market conditions throughout Metro Vancouver and the Fraser Valley – with sales representing at least 15 per cent of listings – should ensure stable house prices for at least the next year, according to an article in today’s Vancouver Sun by Bruce Constantineau.

That was the consensus among real estate representatives Thursday after a Conference Board of Canada report revealed home sales rose in 24 of 28 Canadian markets between April and May this year.

Metro Vancouver sales on the Multiple Listing Service rose by nearly 10 per cent to 2,882 while Fraser Valley sales rose by one per cent to 1,379.

Sales in both jurisdictions fell from the same month last year and are well down from historical highs but the Conference Board noted the average selling price of a Metro Vancouver residential property rose by 4.8 per cent in the past year to $744,712. The average Fraser Valley price rose by two per cent to $486,072.

“Values might be up a little bit in some markets but for the most part, things are pretty steady and not going in a big direction either way,” Fraser Valley Real Estate Board president Ron Todson said in an interview.

“There’s no obvious reason to expect a quick jolt either way.”

He said balanced market conditions exist when sales represent anywhere from 15 to 25 per cent of total listings and that’s the situation in the Fraser Valley, with the sales-to-listings ratio ranging from 15 per cent in North Surrey to 25 per cent in Cloverdale.

Average MLS selling prices can be deceiving because the sale of a few high-priced luxury properties can skew the overall average price.

Real estate boards like to use “benchmark” prices to determine price trends and the benchmark price for a detached single-family home in the Fraser Valley was $549,200 in May – a 0.2-per-cent increase over the May 2012 price.

The composite benchmark price for all Metro Vancouver residential properties was $598,400 in May – a 4.3-percent drop from May 2012 but 1.8 per cent higher than January 2013.

The Metro Vancouver market switched from a buyers’ market to a balanced market in March, when the sales-to-listings ratio rose from 14 per cent to 15 per cent, where it still stands, said Real Estate Board of Greater Vancouver president-elect Ray Harris.

“Historically, we’re in some of the slowest times we’ve had over the past five to 10 years but the buyers’ market that existed for a couple of years has transitioned to a more balanced market with more stability,” he said.

Re/Max Westcoast manager Richard Laurendeau said Metro Vancouver sellers generally get about 95 or 96 per cent of their asking price now but it usually takes a few days longer for homes to sell. He said it took an average of 54 days to sell a home last month, compared with 45 days in May 2012.

RESALE HOME VALUES IN MAY, WITH YEARLY CHANGE

Vancouver:       $744,712; up 4.8%

Fraser Valley:  $486,072; up 2%

Victoria:           $469,343; down 4.6%

Calgary:            $426,155; up 3.3%

Winnipeg:        $259,523; up 1.6%

Toronto:           $515,294; up 3.4%

Montreal:         $319,486; up 2.4%

Source: Conference Board of Canada

What is forecast to happen to Canada’s housing market? It’s all looking good

Wednesday, June 19th, 2013

Not so fast. The purported collapse of Canada’s housing market does not appear to be in sight, and any correction down the road could likely be a mild one.

Recent data have defied warnings from market watchers of an impending plunge – caused mainly by the impact of tighter mortgage rules imposed by the federal government last summer to slow the race by consumers for record-low lending rates.

The latest figures show sales of existing homes strengthened for a second month in May, up by a seasonally adjusted 3.6 per cent, after declining 10 per cent between July and March.

The Canadian Real Estate Association, in a report Monday, also said home prices were up 3.7 per cent in May from the same month a year earlier, to a national average of $388,910.

For all of this year, CREA pegs the average price rise at 2.1 per cent, to $370,900, weaker but far removed from correction territory. And in 2014, the average value is expected to rise 1.8 per cent to $377,700, the Ottawa-based industry group said.

“Prices remain stable, perhaps maddeningly so for the legions of bubble mongers,” said Douglas Porter, chief economist at BMO Capital Markets.

Porter noted the May data show “housing remains on track for a fabled soft landing … making a mockery of talk of an imminent collapse.”

While CREA still anticipates sales to fall 2.5 per cent in total during 2013 compared to 2012 – to 443,400 units from 454,573 – home buying should rebound to 464,300 units in 2014, a jump of 4.7 per cent.

Last July, Finance Minister Jim Flaherty announced stricter mortgage lending rules, the fourth such move in four years. The changes included a shorter amortization period for mortgages insured by government-owned Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp. in an effort to limit lending to those least able to afford it.

Flaherty went even further, subsequently warning banks not to pursue “race-to-the-bottom” rates for mortgages that could further pile on household debt beyond already record-high levels and reignite those concerns over a possible housing bubble.

Much of his expressed concern was focused on condominium building in Toronto and Vancouver, which it was feared might result in a glut and possible crash in those markets.

“History tells us that the impact from changes to mortgage insurance rules tend to be temporary, lasting up to three quarters,” said Diana Petra-mala, at TD Economics.

Petramala agrees Canada’s housing market appears to be headed for a soft landing, “with sales and prices growing at more sustainable levels than had been the case through 2010 and 2011.”

The spark that helped ignite the housing frenzy initially came from policy-makers at the Bank of Canada. Led by then-governor Mark Carney, the bank slashed its trendsetting lending rate to 25 basis points in 2009 to spur spending by households and businesses coming out of the recession.

While that rate was subsequently raised to one per cent in September 2010, it has not been adjusted since. Many economists do not expect that to change until at least late 2014.

“As long as interest rates stay low, affordability will remain relatively high. We have many times changed the mortgage rules, and we were attacking the wrong source of the problem,” said Charles St-Arnaud, an economist at Nomura Global Economics in New York.

“The reason why the housing market was so strong was, basically, interest rates were so low. The issue was not the availability of credit, it was the price at which it was given,” he said.

“If you were to give the same availability but, let’s say, 200 basis points higher, I don’t think we would be here in terms of the housing market.”

Carney has also been adamant – along with Flaherty – that consumers need to tighten their belts, warning household debt posed the biggest threat to the Canadian economy.

That mantle of concern has been passed to Stephen Poloz, who on June 3 replaced Carney – soon to be the new Bank of England governor.

Source: Gordon Isfeld, Financial Post

Are you a first-time homebuyer wondering where to live in Metro Vancouver?

Monday, June 17th, 2013

If you’re a young twentysomething first-time homebuyer looking to get on the property ladder in Metro Vancouver, where should you start looking for a home that you can afford?

I recently came across this article by Michael Ferreira of Urban Analytics which could help to point you in the right direction.

Generation Y has many advantages over others, but when it comes to buying a first home it appears the “good old days” truly did belong to baby boomers.

Today’s twentysomethings are not only having trouble earning meaningful pay cheques to put toward a mortgage, but the Canadian government has made it even tougher by tightening lending rules to keep a leash on the housing market. Combine this with a decade-long rise in house prices across Canada, it’s no surprise Gen Y is feeling down about buying their first home.

While it’s a discouraging time for young people with a dream of owning their first home, it’s not impossible for Gen Y to buy. At Vancouver-based Urban Analytics, we’ve watched the evolving first-time homebuyer market for years and can offer some advice to young people – Metro Vancouver in particular – who are contemplating buying their first home.

Tip #1 – Consider “best buy” locations (not the electronics store)
By “best buy” we mean the five areas in Metro Vancouver with the largest selection of new condos and townhomes. These include: Richmond, Coquitlam, Southeast False Creek, Surrey Central, and neighbourhoods south of the Fraser. In fact, Richmond is now the most competitive new condominium market in the region as developers have become increasingly aggressive in their fight for market share. Six major new condo projects totaling more than 1,000 units have launched in Richmond in the past two months alone. Another five condo projects are potentially launching in the next few months. Now may be the time to invest in Richmond.

Tip #2 – Think like Donald Trump: Negotiate

When it comes to buying a new condo unit from a plan, don’t be afraid to ask for a discount or for an upgrade feature to be included. Your real estate agent can also do this for you – just let them know what you want. Some developers are more willing to negotiate than others, depending on their sales targets or those of their lender, so it never hurts to make a pitch.

More and more developers are offering incentives these days. Some include: Bohème on East Hastings where buyers of units more than $330,000 receive either a new Fiat car or $15,000 in cash; at The Rolston in downtown Vancouver, renters who buy in the building receive $1,000 off their mortgage payments for three years, or $500 off for six years; at the Wall Centre Central Park in Burnaby, buyers receive a 3.2-per-cent credit off purchase price. These incentives result in significant savings.

Tip #3 – Tis’ the Season? Or is it?
Spring typically brings with it a sense of renewal, which seems to get more people thinking of buying a new home, is a traditionally strong home-buying season. That means more competition for properties, and less incentive from sellers to offer discounts. Unless your timing is tight, consider buying during traditionally slower times of the year such as mid-summer when there are fewer buyers, and sellers and developers may be more willing to negotiate.

Tip #4 – Become a Landlord

Buying a house doesn’t have to mean carrying the entire mortgage on your own. A lot of first-time homebuyers purchase properties with two or more bedrooms or units, and rent out the extras to roommates or tenants. Becoming a landlord isn’t for everyone, but if you’re up for a little extra work, and some company, it could make the difference between changing your status from renter to buyer.

What sells condos? Apparently grocery stores

Wednesday, June 12th, 2013

Across Vancouver, mixed-use development – especially ones with specialty food markets or full-service grocery stores on the ground level – are popping up like mushrooms after a spring rain.

Condo purchasers want a new kind of lifestyle – one of convenience. As living space shifts downtown, municipalities are shedding old zoning models in which homes were placed in one spot, retail in another, industry in yet another, and everyone drove from one to the other. In Toronto, the movement is ramping up. In Vancouver, where space is at a premium, it’s rampant.

Yaletown was a decaying industrial area before Vancouver designated it as a mixed-use residential-commercial hub and made it a priority for redevelopment in the late 1990s. First, a highrise condo went up, then Choices Markets Ltd. won the lease to provide groceries in a structure adjacent to the residential building.

“The original developer approached us for tenancy as both a means of providing service to the neighbourhood and adding a selling feature for their condo development,” says Tyler Romano, director of marketing for Choices, a retailer known for natural and organic foods.

The developer approached national chains, but at the time they did not have a format for a grocery store with a smaller footprint. Choices won them over with plans to stock the shelves in only 11,500 square feet, a 10th of the size of a suburban big-box grocery store.

Over the past 13 years, as at least 15 condo towers were added, the area has morphed into a vibrant, upscale oasis, “a perfect fit for our brand of socially conscious, community-minded green retailing,” Mr. Romano says. “This works perfectly for the car-less urban dweller who adheres to the two-bags, six-blocks shopping pattern.”

The grocer has adapted its offerings for the clientele – many of them younger single people and busy professionals who want to pick up dinner right where they live – with grab-and-go items from the salad bar and deli making up a high proportion of sales.

“It’s unbelievably convenient when it’s nine o’clock at night and all you have to do is go straight down the stairs and walk into a store and grab products,” Mr. Romano adds.

In Toronto, grocery was always part of the plan of the massive Concord CityPlace development which, when complete, will be home to 20,000 people. Tucked in a downtown corner off Spadina Avenue, a vibrant 20,000-square-foot Sobeys grocery store offers benches outside for patrons to take the sun, with a flower shop up front.

“It’s quite quickly becoming the heart and soul of CityPlace,” says Gabriel Leung, director of development for Concord Adex. “Financially, if we could have landed a retailer sooner, we could have leveraged on that and included it in our marketing materials. People always appreciate these kind of things in an urban centre.”

Concord Park Place, the developer’s second Toronto highrise neighbourhood at Sheppard and Leslie streets in Toronto’s North York area that will boast 10,000 units when complete in 2018, does not yet have a grocer. “We’ve been talking to a few other mainstream operators,” Mr. Leung says, adding that it takes a long time to negotiate with national chains.

Originally, though, the grocery store was not part of the plan. Home Depot Inc., which had wanted to get closer to the downtown condo market, had signed a lease agreement with developer RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust, but when the economy in the United States sharply contracted in 2008, the hardware giant was forced to lay off employees and close stores. It broke its lease with RioCan. Almost immediately grocery stores lined up to fill the vacancy.

David Speigel, vice-president of operations at Tribute Communities, which partnered with RioCan to work on the residential portion of the project, recalls welcoming the switch to a grocery store. Tribute wasn’t keen to have residents live on top of a hardware store.

Mr. Speigel thinks residential can co-exist right next to retail – although mixed-use planning is more complex and there are few developers with the expertise to construct both. “It becomes very complicated because you have floors that are servicing both retail and residential.”

A small development, epecially, makes more sense financially when combined with retail stores beneath, Mr. Speigel said. “It’s less important when you have a 40-storey building; the retail at the bottom of it becomes less significant.”

He maintains downtown condo buyers are happy to live above the grocery store. He even knows of one, happy to wander down to the store to grab his dinner in his “boxers and flip flops” on a cold winter day.

Source: Beverley Smith, The Globe and Mail

Sales of homes in Vancouver are increasing

Wednesday, June 5th, 2013

Home sales increased in May for the first time since September 2011, the Real Estate Board of Greater Vancouver reported Tuesday.

The year-over-year increase is small at just one per cent, and the number of sales is still 19.4 per cent below the 10-year average, but sales jumped 9.7 per cent when compared to April, the board reported.

Even though historically (sales) are still low, they are still improved,” said Sandra Wyant, president of the Greater Vancouver board.

The number of listings is 18 per cent below the number of listings last year and the sales-to-listings ratio for May was 17 per cent, whereas in January it was just 12 per cent, Wyant said.

“We’ve seen some steadying trends over the last three months,” Wyant said. “The number of homes listed for sale has been keeping pace with the number of property sales, leading to a balanced sales-to-listings ratio. This is having a stabilizing influence on home price activity.”

Meanwhile, home sales in the Fraser Valley were the slowest they’ve been in May since 2001, the Fraser Valley Real Estate Board reported Tuesday.

Sales were down 15 per cent compared with sales in May last year, but up one per cent from this April.

The number of properties for sale was also the highest it’s been this year, but slightly lower than the number for sale last year.

Ron Todson, president of the Fraser Valley board, called it a “transitioning market.”

“Sales are about 20-per-cent lower than normal for this time of year, while the number of new listings coming on stream is right on average,” Todson said.

The composite benchmark price in May for detached homes in Greater Vancouver dropped 5.2 per cent from May 2012 to $917,200, while the benchmark price of an apartment dropped 3.7 per cent to $365,600 and for a townhome fell 3.2 per cent to $454,900, the board reported.

Despite the low numbers of sales, prices are stable in the Fraser Valley, Todson said.

The benchmark price of a single family detached home in the Fraser Valley was $549,200 in May, an increase of 0.2 per cent from the same month last year. The benchmark price of a townhouse is $298,000, down 2.9 per cent year-over-year, while the benchmark price of an apartment was virtually unchanged at $203,400, the Fraser Valley board reported.

Source: Tracy Sherlock, Vancouver Sun

Thinking of selling? Here are the main threats to your home’s value

Friday, May 31st, 2013

There are many factors that could potentially reduce the value of your home. According to a recent article on MSN Money by Leah Culler, here are 8 potential deal breakers:

1. Location

Threat to value: Could be high – in some cases, 50% or more

What are the three most important factors in determining a home’s value? You guessed it: location, location and location. Although you likely considered location when you bought or built your home, something may have changed since then: rezoning, an increase in crime or a new city dump. So what can you do? Well, that depends on what about your location is bringing down the value. If you have a view of the city dump, for instance, you can plant some privacy hedges to make it less of an issue. Play up your home’s strengths; make sure every interior and exterior detail is perfect and be patient.

2. Lack of updates

Threat to value: Low to medium; usually, at least 10%

When there’s an oversupply of homes, buyers can be picky — and they definitely are. Rather than seeing the potential in an outdated kitchen and bathroom, a buyer will just move on to another home that won’t require as much work and vision. Granite countertops, new appliances, and a modern kitchen and bathroom, will all help to increase value. For between $5,000 and $8,000, you can install those granite countertops, update the light fixtures and add fresh paint and carpet. You’ll likely get a return of $15,000 to $20,000 when it is time to sell.

3. Bad floor plan

Threat to value: Medium to high; up to 25%

Appraisers consider odd floor plans when appraising homes. Without easy access to upstairs and an open layout, appraisers classify this as a functional problem which can reduce an appraised value by as much as 25 per cent compared with similarly sized homes.

4. Major systems and structures

Threat to value: Medium to high; up to 20%

A buyer wants to be able to walk in and say, ‘I could move right in’. Major system and structure issues kill potential deals in high-end neighbourhoods. Have an inspection done before you list your house and fix the major things. A roof that needs to be replaced could knock 15 per cent off the value. A heating and air-conditioning system that needs repairs could cut the value by as much as 20 per cent, and an electrical-system problem is probably somewhere between eight per cent and 10 per cent.

5. No garage

Threat to value: Varies; usually about $5,000

A garage definitely adds value to a home, and the key is to have the right-size garage for the home and the neighbourhood. If you have a one-car garage in a 1,200-square-foot home in a starter neighbourhood, there’s a big premium for that, but if you have a one-car garage in a half-million-dollar home, that’s a functional problem. The added value for a garage varies greatly by neighbourhood, but a good rule of thumb is $5,000 per stall.

6. No fence

Threat to value: Low; 5% to 10%

Many potential buyers are looking for a home with a fence because they have pets or want their children to be able to play in the yard safely. When you look at standard appraisal forms, there is a premium paid for fences. Porches and decks also add value to homes because people like outdoor space.

7. Allergens

Threat to value: Low to medium; up to 15%

A little mould under a sink could potentially kill contracts. Even if buyers could easily get rid of it, sometimes they just back out. If people have an allergy, they’re going to run. Possible problems also include cigarette smoke and pet dander. No matter how many times you clean your home, you can never really get rid of Fido.

8. Fit and polish

Threat to value: Low; 5% to 10%

How’s your curb appeal? Is your lawn mowed? Is there chipped or peeling paint on the outside of your home? This is a sure way to negatively affect the value of a home and turn a buyer off. Buyers wonder if sellers can’t take care of simple items like peeling paint, what will the rest of the house look like?

What about the inside of your home? Small things like a stain in the bathtub or a hole in the wall can stand out to buyers. These repairs may be inexpensive, but they can make all the difference when it’s time to sell. Make sure you’ve got good paint and carpet. Whatever you spend there is usually a good investment.

See what’s in store for Vancouver’s house prices this year

Wednesday, May 29th, 2013

The Canadian housing market is calming rather than crashing, as the impact of tougher mortgage rules and cooling credit is partly offset by the supportive influence of low interest rates and continued income growth, according to a new report from BMO Economics.

“House prices have hit record highs in most regions across Canada, though the rate of appreciation has slowed,” said Sal Guatieri, Senior Economist, BMO Capital Markets.

Resale markets are largely balanced, though buyers have gained leverage in some provinces, including Quebec and British Columbia.

Steadier prices are expected in the year ahead amid decent job growth. A benign outlook for rates and income should support affordability this year, weighing towards relatively steady sales and prices in most regions.

Canadian Housing Market Balanced Mr. Guatieri noted Toronto house prices, though slowing, hit a record high in April; gains in the detached market more than offset slightly lower condo values. Alberta enjoyed decent price gains, while Vancouver’s prices have declined moderately.

“Nationwide, housing starts have adjusted to the reduced demand, returning to household formation rates,” Mr. Guatieri added. “Meantime, Toronto continues to build up rather than out to meet supportive demographic demand.”

BMO Housing Confidence Report found that nearly half of Canadian homeowners (48 per cent) intend to buy a property in the next five years — mostly unchanged from fall 2012 — signalling a high level of confidence in Canada’s housing market is continuing into 2013.

Laura Parsons, Mortgage Expert, BMO Bank of Montreal, noted that it is essential for both buyers and sellers to be aware of any changing conditions on the local level. “If planning to buy or sell a property, consider working with an expert who can help you make decisions that are appropriate to the health of your local market, and more importantly, that responsibly fit within your particular financial situation.”

Source: MarketWire, Vancouver Sun

Which is cheaper – moving or renovating your home?

Sunday, May 26th, 2013

Ever wonder about the costs associated with moving versus putting money into renovating your home? Garry Marr from the Financial Post added up the figures.

Here’s a way to get some value from your house without selling. Just be prepared to stay put and be ready for some headaches.

Renovating can make your home bigger and more valuable but without any of the enormous transaction costs that can easily top 10%, depending on where you live in the country.

The federal government might have made it more difficult with its tighter and tighter regulations over the last three years to extract cash out of your home to pay for renovations.

Whereas once you could refinance your home for up to 90% of the value, it’s now only 80%.

If you bought a $500,000 home with 5% down, it has to rise in value past $600,000 before you would be able to extract some equity for a renovation. With home price increases shrinking — they are not falling in most parts of the country despite the general negativity — that hasn’t left much opportunity for a major project.

But guess what? Canadians have other ideas. A new poll shows they are actually saving for major projects based on the results that reveal a majority of Canadians are paying for a renovation with cash.

A Bank of Nova Scotia study found 44% of Canadian homeowners plan to do a major renovation in the next two years. Among that group, 62% will fund the transaction with cash.

“The renovation market is quite large in Canada and quite consistent, people are reinvesting in their homes,” says David Stafford, director of real estate secured lending with Scotiabank.

The amount of money spent on renovations in Canada is still dwarfed by the money people spend on buying homes but it’s not small potatoes either. The latest annual data from Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp. put the market at $20.9-billion in 2011 across 10 major markets.

Unfortunately for the 2.6 million people in Toronto, they live in a jurisdiction with two land transfer taxes. You have to pay both the city and province which amounts to $16,200 on a $600,000 purchase or about 2.7% of the value. The only other city with an equivalent tariff is Montreal with its so-called welcome tax.

Consider some of the other costs associated with moving. Realtors charge about 4% to 5% commission on the sale of your home. Add in legal fees, moving costs and some of the soft costs like painting and minor repairs that come with any selling and buying transaction and it’s not hard to get to 10%.

“I wouldn’t say renovation is just a financial decision,” says Mr. Stafford. “People are looking to improve the quality of their environment. The financing and financial requirement are just part of that decision.”

It’s a good point. We’ve come to think of our houses as an investment because they can easily top 50% of our net worth but they are as much about consumption as anything.

Let’s say you do that $50,000 kitchen project. Is your house really going to be worth that much when it comes time to sell? Probably not but in the interim you get to enjoy all those years of cooking and eating in your fabulous kitchen.

“The reality is that very few renovations return a dollar for dollar,” said Mr. Stafford, adding one of the other reasons people choose to improve their existing home are qualitative. “They like the neighbourhood they are in.”

There’s no question not all renovations go as planned. One of the great perils of renovation is doing the whole thing in cash, to avoid HST, and without permits to avoid costly fees.

“It’s cheaper in the short run but maybe not the long run,” says Raymond Leclair vice-president of public affairs with the Lawyers’ Professional Indemnity Company.

The tax is ultimately something that your contractor is required to pay and there’s nothing technically illegal with a verbal contract. But when things go wrong, what do you do without a paper trail?

“It becomes a ‘he said, she said’ situation and you get into court before a judge and say ‘he painted it blue and it’s supposed to be green’. The other said says the opposite,” says Mr. Leclair.

And when it comes to permits, think twice about not doing it by the book. When you sell, the buyer may ask if that addition you built is up to code. The city can ultimately order any project done without proper permits to be taken down, says Mr. Leclair.

Doing a renovation on the books is going to cost you more money. For sure. But when you start by saving up to 10%, it’s worth it.

Renting versus buying a home – which is best?

Friday, May 24th, 2013

Should you buy or should you rent? There are many factors to consider and what is right for one person may not be right for you. The following is an article that addresses this dilemma which appeared in today’s Vancouver Sun.

My landlord’s email twisted my stomach into knots.

She informed me that she plans to sell the bright, spacious, perfectly located condo that I’d been renting for the past year and a half.

I would have to leave in three months, she said.

Once the initial shock wore off, I asked myself: “Is it time for me to finally grow up and buy place of my own?”

Farhaneh Haque, director of mortgage advice at TD Canada Trust, said the first factor to consider is whether or not you can actually afford to buy.

“Really have a good understanding of where you stand financially today,” she said.

That means finding out whether there’s enough money for a down payment — a minimum of five per cent of the home’s purchase price. It’s also important to look at what other debts you owe and how stable your employment is.

And the down payment is just one cost to consider. Haque recommends potential home buyers set aside another 1.5 to three per cent of the purchase price to take care of closing costs.

Once the papers have been signed and the property is yours, it’s not just the mortgage payments that you have to worry about after that.

Can you afford property taxes, condo fees, heat, electricity and repairs?

“When you own a home, you can’t call the landlord. Guess what? You’re the landlord,” said Haque.

“You have to create a cushion in your monthly budget to provide for these additional costs.”

Shannen Lazorko, a home financing adviser at Scotiabank, said those costs should be put into the context of the benefits of owning a property.

“At the end of the day, if you continue renting, you’re building someone else’s future,” she said.

Sometimes it does make sense to rent if you’re moving around frequently for work or if the money simply isn’t there.

“I would say, yes definitely it would make sense to rent, but always with the plan to build toward home ownership,” Lazorko said.

“Long term renting to me does not make any sense if you can build towards owning something.”

Steve van der Woerd has a different perspective. He ditched home ownership in favour of renting two years ago — more for lifestyle reasons than financial.

For five years, he owned a condo in Burnaby, B.C.

“There, I was able to get 1,200 square feet, a nice big deck — something I just couldn’t have found in the city of Vancouver for that price.”

But van der Woerd found he didn’t like feeling so disconnected from the cultural and social life in the city. He didn’t like the car-centric way of life and the chores associated with keeping up the condo.

Now, van der Woerd rents in the Vancouver’s South Granville neighbourhood, not far from downtown. He spends less time in his car and has considerably less stress.

“If you’re in Vancouver and you’re thinking of buying, inevitably you’re going to move into a less desirable area unless you’ve got lots of money. My advice would be don’t do that to yourself.”

As for me, I have enough saved for a down payment and the bank pre-approved me for a mortgage at a great interest rate.

But in the end, I decided to keep renting a little longer and build up more of a financial cushion.

When the adviser at my bank plugged the mortgage payments and the extra costs into a calculator, it added up to half my monthly income. That would mean less money for travel, lift tickets and nights out with friends — not to mention emergencies.

“That’s what’s called being house poor,” the adviser said with a laugh.

Source: Lauren Krugel, The Canadian Press

Just how affordable is Metro Vancouver?

Friday, May 10th, 2013

The high costs of development could be helping to drive up housing prices in the city of Vancouver, figures provided to The Vancouver Sun by the Urban Development Institute show.

Various city development fees, community amenity charges and sustainability requirements add tens of thousands of dollars to the cost of building a condominium unit in the city of Vancouver. Vancouver charges far more than Burnaby and Surrey, the figures show.

Sky-high land costs and slightly higher construction charges also add to the cost of development in Vancouver compared to other parts of Metro.

“The significant cost premiums of building new homes in Vancouver, compared to Surrey, leads to two observable results,” said Anne McMullin, president and CEO of the Urban Development Institute. “Either the increased costs will inevitably be passed on to homebuyers or the viability of building new market housing will be suppressed. Regardless, the end game is a more unaffordable and less socially sustainable city.”

She says the most obvious way to address affordability is to look at the costs and supply of housing.

“Costs affect supply — if it’s too expensive to build, you’re going to limit the supply. But we still have the demand. There’s always going to be a demand — there are buyers who can afford it.”

But Brian Jackson, the City of Vancouver’s general manager of planning, says market demand drives the price of housing much more than the costs of development.

“If we took $1,000 off the cost of the CACs or we took $1,000 off the cost of the DCLs,” Jackson said, referring to two types of city development fees, “is the developer going to take $1,000 off the cost of selling the house? I don’t think they would – they’re going to get the highest price that they could.”

Nonetheless, he acknowledges developers take a lot of risks when they build in Vancouver.

“I think it’s a tough game out there, especially when the market is becoming soft like it is now,” Jackson said.

It may be a risky game for developers, but the figures provided to The Vancouver Sun still show developers making a sizable profit: even with the higher development costs in Vancouver the expected profit is $80,694 per unit, in Burnaby $54,652 and in Surrey $34,668.

Source: Tracy Sherlock, Vancouver Sun


Real Estate Blogs